Showing posts with label Jimmy Scott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Scott. Show all posts

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Song of the Moment: AT LAST



It's been inescapable--the last 36 hours we've been subject to endless TV and internet replay of the Obamas' first dance as First Couple, and that means the first sung lines of Beyoncé's cover of "At Last" is stuck in our collective pop culture brain like a skipped record. Beyoncé makes a fair attempt at recreating the iconic magic of Etta James (whom Beyoncé played recently in the movie Cadillac Records) but need I point out that Beyoncé is no Etta James?

Etta James' "At Last" (1961) is certainly well-known and rightly so; it's a gorgeous recording. Opening with a lovely sweep of strings and a pulsing piano driving the song forward, James' strong, ragged-around-the-edges vocal is the real pleasure.



The song is a great vocal showcase, dropping low and soaring high to deliver the expectant surprise of the lyric. I suppose that's what draws vocalists to "At Last" in the first place, but as I started to muse over other covers of the song, I was quickly reminded that all covers are not created equal!

One of my favorite recordings of "At Last" is the GLENN MILLER ORCHESTRA (1942) with RAY EBERLE performing the vocal. As you would expect from a Miller tune, this is smooth stuff with a strong horn section backing Eberle's rich Crosby-like croon. It makes you want to slow dance with a tall, handsome somebody you met during the War. Recommended.

LOU RAWLS named an entire album after the song (1989) and recorded "At Last" as a duet with the deeply fabulous DIANNE REEVES. The arrangement is, unfortunately, very 1980s with a synth-driven beat (is that a drum machine?!) I'd think the song would be a great fit for Rawls, but his vocal is pedestrian at best, while Reeves has some moments where she threatens to steal the number and perform it to best effect. Ultimately, it's not her showcase. A Missed Opportunity.

Oh, JIMMY SCOTT. Gorgeous. His "At Last" (1992) is, in my opinion, the best of this lot. It may be heresy to opine that Scott's vocal is better than Etta James', but I find it more moving. Scott's musical arrangement, however, isn't nearly as appealing. Scott sings with unusual vocal cadences that force your ear to hear most everything he sings anew, even if (as is typical) he is covering songs you have heard several hundred times before. He seems to feel his songs very deeply, so the sense of revelation in Scott's "At Last"--the joy of finding that unexpected love--is very palpable. While this arrangement relies heavily on a string orchestra, it doesn't have the charm of the instrumentation that charges Etta's version. Nonetheless, Jimmy Scott's cover is a worthy successor. Highly Recommended.

A former co-worker from my Time Inc. days, MARIA POSTELL recorded a swinging cover of "At Last" on her album "At This Moment" (1998). Postell delivers the lyrics with flair and displays a vibrant chemistry with the small jazz combo backing her. It's a solid version that keeps you paying attention to the lyric. Enjoyable.

As her career was taking off in 2000, CHRISTINA AGUILERA's ABC-TV special (now a DVD) included "At Last" as a sort of insider's look at backstage hijinks, performing the song for friends and crew

VIDEO: Christina Aguilera's "At Last"

Aguilera had grown up loving the song, and she's not bad--she's a little girl with a big voice she hasn't yet grown into, and she's definitely showing off. Surprisingly, it mostly works. It's an interesting outtake, and you can see shades of the dirrty tranny clown she was to become later, but basically she pulls it off. An Interesting Novelty.

While similar in orchestrated approach to Scott's version, JONI MITCHELL's cloying "At Last" (2000) is smothered by ghastly cinematic strings. This isn't surprising inasmuch as Mitchell has been given to fully orchestrated versions of her work in recent years. It's also not a surprising choice for Mitchell to record. In her own songwriting she has often paid tribute through lyric or musical reference to R&B tunes and jukebox hits from her youth. What is surprising is how awful this cover is: even with Mitchell in appealing voice, it's so forcibly "pretty" it's like pouring syrup into your eardrums and drowning as it drains into your sinuses. Saccharine.

In a bare-bones "At Last" (piano and very spare strings) CYNDI LAUPER (2003) seems to be deconstructing the song but it resolutely doesn't work. It's too bad, because Lauper--like so many of the folks in this post--has a strikingly powerful voice. This recording, however, adds up to nothing except some strikingly ugly notes held too long. It's also strange that Lauper sounds so unhappy while singing here; it's completely at odds with the lyric. Puzzling.

CELINE DION performed the song in her long-running Vegas show A New Day (2004). Badly. No diction, no emotion, no apparent understanding of the lyric; Dion seems to be performing it phonetically. This "At Last" opens with what sounds like a Kenny G electronic oboe over a karaoke bar orchestration. The usual grotesque melisma. Nothing to see here; move along. Worst of the lot.

Thank you, Lord, for those increasingly rare occasions when PHOEBE SNOW records: her live version (1991) is theatric camp but it must have been riveting for the lucky audience. Snow boldly uses "At Last" in a manner many of these other vocalists have just hinted at: she hijacks it as a showcase for her magnificent voice. There are not many voices as powerful as Snow's and here she squeals, shouts, wails, and wrestles the song into complete submission. It's an ecstatic delivery; triumphal and surprised and sexy. It culminates in a crazy bit of vocalizing that is pure Phoebe and concludes with one clarion note that must have brought them to their feet. Silly but Quite Wonderful.

ARETHA FRANKLIN (she of the Inaugural Bonnet!) recorded the song, but it was cut from her 1974 album "Let Me In Your Life". God knows why, because it's a great cover with all the wonder of Aretha's voice in her prime. An orchestrated slow-funk groove allows Aretha to swoop and sail soulfully around the proceedings. It's a classic and gorgeous "At Last"; ample evidence of why Aretha is regarded as highly as she is. Highly Recommended.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Falling In Love Is Wonderful (1962)



Jimmy Scott possesses one of those voices that does me in--in a good way. His growth and vocal development were stunted by an affliction known as Kallmann Syndrome (delayed puberty) leaving him with a unique, gender-neutral singing voice. The first time I heard his high, reedy voice on CD in the mid-90s, I wanted to know the name of the woman behind such a mesmerizing sound! It took me a long time to reconcile the voice to the man.
FALLING IN LOVE IS WONDERFUL was meant to be Jimmy Scott's big breakthrough in 1962, after many years of having his vocals incorrectly attributed to female singers, or uncredited altogether on the recordings of Lionel Hampton and other swing bands. The album was produced by Ray Charles on Charles' own Tangerine label, and the arrangements are lovely, reminiscent of classic Nelson Riddle-style orchestrations that flatter both the songs and the singer. Upon the album's release, however, an unscrupulous former manager insisted that Scott was still under contract to a competing label (Savoy) and Tangerine had to cease and desist release of the new album. Scott attempted to record again in 1969 (the equally marvelous THE SOURCE) but again Savoy claimed ownership, so Jimmy Scott recordings were effectively embargoed for decades and his career collapsed. He worked as a hospital orderly and elevator operator for years.
The good news is that there has been a prolific second act to Scott's life & career. He was "re-discovered" and managed to get honest deals with legitimate studios in the early 1990s, and he has recorded an eclectic smorgasbord of songs: everything from "Over the Rainbow" to "Nothing Compares 2 U." His thwarted 1960s albums were finally re-released to great acclaim--with good reason, as FALLING IN LOVE IS WONDERFUL proves.
As one would expect, though, his voice had aged into a somewhat different instrument over the course of those 20+ years. The tone remained much the same: clarion, throbbing, insistent--but with each successive Scott release since 1992 (there have been MANY; it's hard not to sense him racing to catch up for the lost time) the voice grows frailer, the warble wider. Those affectations don't hurt my love for the songs or the man singing them, but they certainly shade the experience of hearing him sing. When I finally managed to hear him perform live at Lincoln Center last winter, I realized with regret that I had waited too late. As pleasurable as it was to show the man respect with applause, his performance with a young jazz combo was reduced to nearly unintelligible wailing, with not much strength or tone remaining.
FALLING IN LOVE...then, is really the best chance to listen and wonder "what could have been." Scott is in fantastic voice here, and it's amazing to hear what the singer Nancy Wilson heard, and indeed mimicked in her own recordings. To listen to Jimmy Scott's inspired broken-syllable phrasings is to hear the blueprint for Wilson's inimitable style. FALLING IN LOVE IS WONDERFUL is an album that is as good an introduction to Jimmy Scott as you are likely to find (though I'd be happy to recommend many others). If you don't know him already, suffice to say you should acquaint yourself.